Showing posts with label sad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sad. Show all posts

A corporate with back bone


Google announced, in a carefully worded blog post, that it no longer felt comfortable operating in China. They claimed to have been under serious and protracted cyber attacks from the Chinese government, and that Gmail accounts of advocates of human rights activists have been routinely accessed by third parties.
Privacy and security on the Internet are concepts that the Chinese government regard with annoyance and disdain. Would it be better to work within the limitations and hope for a better day, or to distance oneself from such a depressing place and preserve ones integrity? These are problems that have long confronted foreign companies and local dissidents in China. Some of us (yes, myself included) have to swallow part of our pride every day in order to accept the status quo without going insane. It is simply refreshing to see such an influential corporation behave like a person with honor and integrity. I applauded your decision to establish google.cn four years ago. I applaud your decision to exit the China market now. I hope your action will spark a widespread movement in which companies and politicians would rethink their attitude in dealing with repressive regimes, not limited to China.

Two extraordinary pieces of photographic art


Life Before Death by Walter Schels and Beate Lakotta

This sombre series of portraits taken of people before and after they had died is a challenging and poignant study. Schels and Lakotta recorded interviews with the subjects in their final days, revealing much about dying - and living.



Alzheimer's by Sloan Breeden

(Go to "Projects" and click on "Alzheimer's)

(Via ahsup)

The jobs cut league table


Another league table that investment bankers would never generate. Massive rounds of layoff have become the standard knee-jerk reaction to strategic mistakes made by the senior management. The insecure executive and workers are therefore encouraged to be more risk-taking during the good times, which invariably lead to more calamitous downfalls. It is a sad state of affair, exemplifying the many problems of unbridled capitalism.

From Bloomberg news
March 24, 2008
Firms and jobs cut
  1. Citigroup – 6,200
  2. Lehman Brothers – 4,990
  3. Bank of America – 3,650
  4. Morgan Stanley – 2,940
  5. Washington Mutual –2,600
  6. Merrill Lynch – 2,220
  7. HSBC – 1,650
  8. Bear Stearns – 1,550
  9. WestLB – 1,530
  10. UBS – 1,500
  11. Goldman Sachs – 1,500*
  12. National City – 900
  13. Credit Suisse – 820
  14. Royal Bank of Canada – 500
  15. Fortis – 500
  16. Wells Fargo – 500
  17. Wachovia – 443
  18. Deutsche Bank – 370
  19. JPMorgan Chase – 100
TOTAL – 34,463

The above table shows jobs eliminated by the biggest banks and securities firms since the collapse of the subprime mortgage market in July 2007. The figures are based on company disclosures.

* Goldman Sachs said on Jan. 25 that its job cuts reflected the
firm's policy of weeding out underperformers.

我投票了


昨天是香港歷史上可悲的一天。

香港人一直都以繁榮穩定爲先,在英國統治下近百年都默默耕耘,不問政治。連六四這麽驚天動地的一件事,數年後還是被專注於做生意、搞市場的香港人收起來,只每年默哀一個晚上。

回歸以後,香港人當家作主,初試啼聲,7.1遊行一鳴驚人。無建樹可言的政客只消站在政府對面,撕破喉嚨大呼口號就能撈到政治本錢 –– 反正轉過頭來就可以說“我和北京有良好的溝通渠道” –– 無本生利的生意,當然前赴後繼的去做。可是成果呢?回歸十年,“民主派”能拿出來的政績有什麽?這樣的表現,在我們打工仔的環境裏,早早就吃魷魚了。

可是,“政治”環境當然跟私營公司不一樣。到時到候,選舉了,走出來,聲嘶力竭的大喊一輪口號、說對手擁有鐡票(儘管自己民調從頭到尾都領先)、提前一天準備“告急”號外,到處躺在地上說讓對方助選團”鬆踭”受重傷。這樣就贏了選舉,蒙蒙混混又過了骨。就算選舉期間的歪行接著逐漸曝光,反正到下一次的時候選民又會發揮善忘+愚昧的力量,既往不咎,乖乖的讓人重新洗腦。

競選的政黨不知所謂,報導的傳媒更是面目可惡。生果日報拿出文革式的倂勁,從day 1開始把對手萬般踐踏,連老牌左派文字報都比它客觀得很多、很多。作爲一個飲壹周刊奶水長大的人,我當然知道黎先生很有立場。可是,輿論是社會公器,我能接受你有立場,我不能接受你把propaganda當作事實報道,更不能接受你這麽赤裸地欺騙公衆,以達致一己私利。生果日報、壹周刊近來的每一頁都充斥着仇恨、私心、謊言、滿瀉的malice,絕對應該加上膠套,警告讀者看後會心理嚴重不平衡。

不過,政府在防止選民最後關頭被騷擾、欺壓都做得足夠。話説到底,投下神聖的一票的是選民;把那個“剔”印方方正正的打在選票上的,還是有自由意志的你和我。根據我受什麽民調機構問的exit poll問題,選民的決擇有四大原因:政黨、往績、名氣、其他。政綱呢?理念呢?都歸在收納垃圾的“其他”下嗎?理論上選舉就是讓人民選出與自己理念相近的代表,在公共事務上發言、做決定。是民調機構低能,連選舉的基本功能都忘了,還是廣大的選民壓根兒沒有考慮什麽理念,而我是全香港唯一一個按政綱、公開發言投票的人?

Fiasco


Image of FiascoThis book broke my heart. It is the first time ever that I read a history book and weep.

If you are, like me, a concerned yet lazy global citizen, you'd have caught news about bombings in random Iraqi cities every once in a while, thought about how screwed up things are, wondered what could be done now that the US is already stuck in the quagmire, and returned to your daily routines as there is nothing that you can do.

What Ricks do oh so superbly in this book is to fill in that skeleton and present the reader with a coherent, lucid, and detailed account of what has happened so far. It pierces through the fog of words put up by the Bush government, who have the absolutely best spin doctors in the world, the confusion caused by the media's sporadic interest, and our numbness in the face of a humanity crisis. The result is, we no longer have an excuse to ignore the war in Iraq.

Before I started reading this book, I was worried that I'd be reading some wacko's exaggerated, emotional, conspiratorial account of the Iraq war, as implied by the title. I was hooked by the second page. Ricks's prose is clinical and precise. Dates and people are clearly identified, assertions duly footnoted, and quotes corroborated. As I flipped through the pages, a line in my head slowly connects dots of information hidden in the back of my mind - names of cities and provinces, utterings by officials and generals, bits and pieces of bombing footages. The reason I am comfortable to accept Ricks's version of the events is that it is supported by published sources, created at the time or very shortly after events take place. This is not someone making up facts to support his vendetta, with the help of 20/20 hindsight; this is a professional journalist writing a report in accordance with the strictest journalism principles.

Firmly convinced by the romantic notions of neoconservatism, the hawks of Washington DC went into Iraq without any reconstruction planning. An army of young and hotheaded soldiers was sent to Iraq expecting jubilant crowds in the street, welcoming their liberators. Instead, the undersized troops found themselves stuck in fighting an insurgency, the techniques for which was nearly wiped out from the Army's institutional memory following Vietnam. As we ponder and debate what is happening in Iraq, over a thousand Iraqi civilians die every month from violence, millions have their home destroyed in the crossfire, and countless are insulted daily by the presence of an unwelcome guest in their country and (literally) home. How can the "leaders" of the West continue to sit on their hands and wonder why are there more and more insurgents every day?

Apart from being outraged by the mess created, I am also shocked to the core by the lessons pointed out by Ricks. It is because I have actually witnessed many of them in my world. Incompetence of senior officials, distrust of local knowledge, hostility to dissenting views, and, most important of all, refusal to acknowledge mistakes - these are all very common in our workplace and I have personally fought many such incidences. These are real. The only difference here is the cost of these "blunders" are not just a few zeroes in a dollar figure, but the loss of life on a massive scale. We can no longer afford to shrug off the stupid things that some politicians say and do. There are terrifyingly real consequences to human incompetence, as continuously illustrated by the sad, sad situation in Iraq.

文匯報, 1989年 6月 5日




A record of history,
by 1of@kind


六四的時候,我整家人都在荷蘭,陪爸爸進修。

由五月開始,我們每天晚上都伏在很小很小的黑白電視前,焦急的希望在荷蘭文的電視台找到報道六四的片言隻語。

爸爸有幾個同學是從國内來的,都與廣場上的年輕人一般的血氣方剛,對明日充滿希望。爲了聲緩廣場上的同胞,他們搞了好幾個遊行。我們一家都有上街,對這麽一個新時代的來臨既興奮又憂心。當時的我很小,才九歲,連去遊行也要帶一本金庸,邊喊口號邊看書。

當時只知道中國的人民要民主,是自從文革後第一次有這麽大型、有秩序的公開民間訴求。但中國政府不愛聼,就派兵把人都殺了。

經過這麽多年,聽到的,認知的,有了許多complications。永遠沒有人能掌握歷史的全部。人的性格、思想、觀念也不斷的轉變。

可是,有些事實也不容改寫。有人死了。是政府殺的。無論是什麽情況下發生、無論是死了多少人,這都不對。這麽多年來,還是不容許討論、不平反,這都不對。

十八年了。我們會有一天等到嗎?

今晚見。

深圳小股神10歲炒股


This is a perfect illustration of how irrational the market is in China. Literally a 10-year old child could make money in today's market.

What goes up must come down. How many cycles does it take for people to really learn this adage?


深圳小股神10歲炒股

深圳一名10歲「小股神」,3歲開始看股票新聞,7歲開始為父母炒股出謀劃策,10歲下了第一單。

「南方網」報道,小股神尹航的母親周女士說,懷尹航時,正是其上班公司股票上市其間,她每天挺著肚子整理、審核數據。也許因為她的這一工作和生活習慣,尹航從小就對數據和股票資訊非常敏感。尹航出生後,脾氣暴躁,但一打開電視讓他聽新聞或股票行情,他就會立刻安靜下來。

周女士表示,從3歲多到7歲,看新聞聯播和各類經濟新聞,成了尹航每天最大的樂趣。此外,他也開始虛擬炒股,以檢驗自己的能力。2004年上半年,中國全國股市熊市時。一次,7歲的尹航跟媽媽到深圳歡樂谷遊玩,發現遊客非常多,聽媽媽說歡樂谷是華僑城公司的項目後,尹航認定其股票一定會漲。尹航再三要求媽媽買華僑城的股票。剛開始,媽媽沒有聽。尹航急到哭了,媽媽這才買了。沒想到,兒子的這一建議,讓周女士獲益頗豐。她說,「也就是從那時起,我發現他的眼光很獨到,我跟丈夫炒股現在也全聽他的指揮。」

因為對股票的專注和興趣,爸爸決定給尹航一次實戰機會——今年1月15日,爸爸投資1.4萬元 (人民幣,下同)作為尹航的炒股基金,賺得的資金八二分帳,爸爸八,尹航二。拿到啟動資金後,尹航興奮地開始了自己人生第一單,他用這些錢購買了3隻股票,其中,深振業A購買時是13.12元,現在,該股票已上漲到22元,收穫頗豐富。而短短幾個月,尹航已通過爸爸的投資賺到了自己的小學學費。

但尹航並不滿足於這些,他表示,他想將自己賺得的錢融入到他和爸爸的炒股基金中,以此來稀釋爸爸的股份,最終獲得話事權,以後再要賣哪隻股票時,可以不通過爸爸的建議就自己直接購買了。

~ 明報網上即時新聞,2007年5月15日

Another piece of extremely frustrating news


How can they say that??? Are they human beings??? I do not understand what kind of political calculus would encourage this kind of utterance. Everyday vocabulary like "outrageous", "moronic", and "disturbing" cannot being to describe the Japanese official stance, which is maddeningly senseless, insulting and simply evil.


日內閣指沒證據強逼慰安婦

日本共同社報道,日本政府內閣經評估後,認為沒有證據顯示二戰時皇軍或政府逼婦女當慰安婦。

報道指,政府內閣回應反對派國會議員質詢,現政府就1993年時任內閣官房長官河野洋平為慰安婦問題道歉的看法時,提交了一份評估文件,指沒有任何紀錄顯示政府或軍方有強逼婦女當慰安婦。

- 明報即時新聞,二〇〇七年三月十六日

English exam


I was watching the news on TV and the incident of a potential case of cheating on the Academic English for Science Students exam was discussed. As usual, random shots of the venue – i.e. Hong Kong University – were shown, including some shots of the door of what I presume to be the exam room. There was a notice on that door asking students not to bring communication devices into the room. If they choose to do so, "you must switched them off."

Perhaps the student(s) was just trying to smuggle a copy of the exam paper out to mock it publicly??? Will post screenshot if I manage to find one.

Here you go:


No Photoshopping, I swear.